Standard 7: Look for & Make Use of Structure

standard 7: look for & make use of structure

Expand +

classroom observations:
Teachers who are developing students’ capacity to "look for and make use of structure" help learners identify and evaluate efficient strategies for solution. An early childhood teacher might help students identify why using "counting on" is preferable to counting each addend by one, or why multiplication or division can be preferable to repeated addition or subtraction. A middle childhood teacher might help his students discern patterns in a function table to "guess my rule." A teacher of adolescents and young adults might focus on exploring geometric processes through patterns and proof. Visit the video excerpts below to view multiple examples of teachers engaging students in identifying and making use of mathematical structure.

the standard:
Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure. Young students, for example, might notice that three and seven more is the same amount as seven and three more, or they may sort a collection of shapes according to how many sides the shapes have. Later, students will see 7 × 8 equals the well remembered 7 × 5 + 7 × 3, in preparation for learning about the distributive property. In the expression x2 + 9x + 14, older students can see the 14 as 2 × 7 and the 9 as 2 + 7. They recognize the significance of an existing line in a geometric figure and can use the strategy of drawing an auxiliary line for solving problems. They also can step back for an overview and shift perspective. They can see complicated things, such as some algebraic expressions, as single objects or as being composed of several objects. For example, they can see 5 – 3(x – y)2 as 5 minus a positive number times a square and use that to realize that its value cannot be more than 5 for any real numbers x and y.

connections to classroom practices

expand all +

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure. Young students, for example, might notice that three and seven more is the same amount as seven and three more, or they may sort a collection of shapes according to how many sides the shapes have.

Liz O'Neill works with her first grade students engaging them in composing and decomposing numbers within twenty, focusing on ways that numbers combine to produce other numbers. She begins by having her students rename a "target" number in as many ways as possible in their math message book. They are then given a 2 second quick look at 3 ten frames and asked to determine that number (23) mentally. Using sentence frames, students share with their partner what number they saw and how they saw it. A variety of ways were discussed as a whole group after everyone had a chance to share with their partner. The main lesson activity is a game called "How Many are Hiding?" Student pairs were given a bag with 10 cubes, a paper plate, and the "How Many Are Hiding Recording Sheet". In addition, sentence frames were posted on the board so students could produce academic language using structured student talk and convince their partners with oral justification. One partner takes some of the cubes and "hides" them under the plate. The remaining are placed on the top. The second partner uses sentence frames to answer the questions "What number do you see?", "How many are hiding?", "How do you know __ are hiding"? In addition, the answers are recorded. Roles are then reversed. The partner game gives students practice in composing and decomposing numbers within ten.

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure.

Mia Buljan’s 3rd-grade students engage in defending their thinking in a number talk. Students work with Buljan to connect the ideas of “switching over from adding, adding, adding, adding, adding, to thinking about multiplying.” Buljan connects and contrasts two students’ approaches to help identify different patterns to inform problem-solving.

They also can step back for an overview and shift perspective.

After her 3rd-grade students work individually on various problems, Buljan invites her students to identify a card on the board that represents the problem they worked.

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure. Young students, for example, might notice that three and seven more is the same amount as seven and three more, or they may sort a collection of shapes according to how many sides the shapes have.

Becca Sherman works with 4th grade students in a “number talk” to connect the basic components of the Singapore Bar Model with students’ original thinking, thus front-loading students with several applications of the Bar Model as a representation of equal parts. In the exploration problem the words “three times” becomes a division problem or a missing factor problem. The intermediary step of drawing a “math picture” or model of the problem, poses a challenge for many students who have limited exposure to models.

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure.

On the second day of the learning segment, Michelle Makinson's students return to their sentence starters and discussion sheets. They examine their work, looking for a set of cards that they matched with a particularly strong justification that they can “save-the-planet-level defend.” Pairs then share their justifications with the whole class, and Michelle challenges her students to communicate precisely and to evaluate their own justifications. She uses a “turn and talk” strategy to generate suggestions to improve the clarity of a justification. She models academic language: “Does anyone have a different strategy for enhancing the justification?” Students consider their own justification cards to make improvements: “Is all the evidence you need there? If not, add it.” This clip also relates and standard 6 (attend to precision).

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure.

Michelle Makinson introduces a new card, a contextualized or word problem representation. She begins by having students create a visual representation matching a contextualized representation, and a verbal representation identifying the mathematical quantities. She emphasizes the importance of the discussion between students that proves that the cards match. She circulates around the classroom, engaging pairs in conversation about their discussion and their representations. Students use tape loops on the back of their cards so that they can rearrange them as needed. She explains the importance of students debating and discussing their representations. They engage in identifying patterns, structures, and connections between the representations.

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure.

Students continue to create sets of cards that match each other (Green: Set or Area Model, White: Verbal Representation, Dark Blue: Contextual / Word Problem, Yellow: Justification). Michelle Makinson asks pairs to explain the connections between the cards. She challenges students to persevere in grappling with a scenario working with 22/12. The class works with incomplete sets of 12 and incomplete wholes, recognizing that students seek to make connections to real life and become confused about how an improper fraction works in reality. The students create connections between the representations based on their observations of patterns and structures. This clip also relates and standard 6 (attend to precision).

Mathematically proficient students…look closely to discern a pattern or structure.

Erika Isomura begins her lesson with engaging her 4th- and 5th-grade students in a conversation about the terms whole and part, activating their prior knowledge of work with mentor “string” problems, asking the students to identify the parts and wholes in each scenario.

Her students then work with new problems, sorting and describing differences and similarities between the new problems and the ones they’d done before:

“Are any of these problems a lot like Jesus's problem, where he already knows his pieces or his parts, but he needs the whole amount? And are any of these problems like Camila’s, where she needs the pieces because she already has the whole?”

Mathematically proficient students…look closely to discern a pattern or structure.

As her 4th- and 5th-grade students work to describe and classify their problems, identifying which are more like Jesus’s problem (multiplying fractional quantities) and which are more like Camila’s problem (finding a fraction of a whole), Erika Isomura circulates around the classroom, questioning them and probing their understanding. Two of the problems she has given her students do not have visual representations; she invites her students to create drawings of those problems if it would be helpful to their process.

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure.

Michelle Kious works with her 5th grade students on understanding multiple representations of mixed numbers. In this clip, a pair of students takes stock of their representation, observing that 6/12 is the same as ½.

They also can step back for an overview and shift perspective.

Michelle Kious works with her 5th grade students on understanding multiple representations of mixed numbers. In this clip, she recognizes that some pairs of students may have changed their approaches as a result of their conversations, and encourages them to note these changes on their papers for sharing out.

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure….They also can step back for an overview and shift perspective.

| Erika Isomura’s students continue pair work on the problems, defending their thinking to each other. They make use of the sentence stems Erika gave them (e.g., “I think ____ because,” “This way is easier on our brains because______,” “What do you think?” “How did you feel about this problem?” “I knew it was this answer because I thought about the 0s”).

      Erika engages pairs in explaining their thinking (e.g., “Show me in your answer,” “Do you think that will work every time?”). She reminds her students to note moments in their work that suggest that they might need to have a discussion about it. This clip also relates to [standard 3 (construct viable arguments & critique the reasoning of others)](http://www.insidemathematics.org/common-core-resources/mathematical-practice-standards/standard-3-construct-viable-arguments-critique-the-reasoning-of-others) and [standard 6 (attend to precision)](http://www.insidemathematics.org/common-core-resources/mathematical-practice-standards/standard-6-attend-to-precision).

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure….They also can step back for an overview and shift perspective.

In the second day of this learning segment, Erika Isomura begins with a number talk with her 5th-grade students, noticing how and why divisors get smaller.

      Her students share their thoughts (e.g., “Divide by 10 each time”) and notice that the quotient is getting bigger by 10 each time. 

      In the number talk, Erika responds to a student’s wondering on the previous day about what happens if you work with a different number, for example, 2,300/100. Erika uses patterns suggested by the students themselves (e.g. “Yeini’s pattern”) to reduce by a power of 10 or increase by a power of 10 (e.g., 2,300 / .001). This clip also relates to [standard 8 (look for & express regularity in repeated reasoning)](http://www.insidemathematics.org/common-core-resources/mathematical-practice-standards/standard-8-look-for-express-regularity-in-repeated-reasoning).

Mathematically proficient students…also can step back for an overview and shift perspective.

Erika Isomura’s 5th-grade students work in pairs to classify, sort, and glue down decimal representations in numerical order. Erika challenges her students to explain and defend their thinking. This clip also relates to standard 3 (construct viable arguments & critique the reasoning of others).

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure….They also can step back for an overview and shift perspective.

Erika Isomura’s 5th-grade students continue to work in pairs to classify, sort, and glue down decimal representations in numerical order. Erika circulates around the classroom, engaging students in sharing their thinking. She says to one pair “This could be our prototype. This is our test run. We're kind of working on it, thinking. After we have some new ideas and maybe we have some better understanding of what we're doing, we can always come back into it. Okay?” This clip also relates to standard 3 (construct viable arguments & critique the reasoning of others) and standard 6 (attend to precision).

Mathematically proficient students….can see complicated things…as single objects or as being composed of several objects.

Erika Isomura’s 5th-grade students continue to work in pairs to classify, sort, and glue down decimal representations in numerical order. Erika invites her students to compare their work to their work for prior investigations and other problems. She reminds each partner to contribute equally to the pair work. She asks “How did you get that? Can you show it to me in a picture or with numbers?” She challenges partners to contribute to their pair’s mutual work: “Make sure he's proving it to you. Don't just let him talk it out.” As partners finish their work, Erika invites them to do a “gallery walk” of other partners’ work to check and compare their work. This clip also relates to standard 1 (make sense of problems and persevere in solving them), standard 3 (construct viable arguments & critique the reasoning of others) and standard 6 (attend to precision).

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure. Young students, for example, might notice that three and seven more is the same amount as seven and three more, or they may sort a collection of shapes according to how many sides the shapes have. Later, students will see 7 × 8 equals the well remembered 7 × 5 + 7 × 3, in preparation for learning about the distributive property.

In the closure section of a number talk, Fran Dickinson works with his 5th/6th grade students to identify many different ways of representing the rule: x3 – 3, times 3 minus 3, 3x – 3. The students discuss the rule and the best way to represent it, making connections to their mathematics textbook in their conversations. This clip is also indicative of standard 3 (construct viable arguments & critique the reasoning of others), standard 6 (attend to precision), and standard 8 (look for & express regularity in repeated reasoning).

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure.

Antoinette Villarin begins her lesson on graphing constant rates of change by reviewing the learning goals and mathematical practices, naming Standards for Mathematical Practice 1, 3, 6, and 7. She notes that it is important that her students understand how to build a mathematical argument, and she shares sentence frames and key vocabulary that the students will use as they build their arguments.

Antoinette presents a model of two bottles attached to each other so that fluid can flow between them, and she asks her students to make sense of the problem by describing what they see happening.

Students share that as the amount of fluid in the top container/prism decreases, the amount in the bottom container/prism increases.

This clip also relates to standard 1 (make sense of problems and persevere in solving them), standard 3 (construct viable arguments & critique the reasoning of others), standard 4 (model with mathematics), and standard 6 (attend to precision).

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure.

Antoinette Villarin asks her student pairs to share their discussions with the whole group. She models academic language — constraints, rate of change, initial value, starting situation — that she expects her students to use.

Once a student pair has shared, Antoinette asks the larger group to add on additional details that helped them identify a matched pair of graphs that show the flow of liquid between a given pair of containers.

Antoinette refers back to her anchor chart of the lesson vocabulary and sentence frames that she expects the students to use, and she names and reinforces students’ use of academic language.

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure.

Cathy Humphreys leads an extended exploration of a proof of the properties of quadrilaterals, helping students learn to investigate, formulate, conjecture, justify, and ultimately prove mathematical theorems. In these clips, students engage in the first of two block-length explorations of their proofs. Humphreys observes, “The square, rectangle, and rhombus appeared to be the most straightforward for the students. Mathematically, if two of the diagonals form right angles, then at least a pair of sides of the quadrilateral will be equal in length. If the diagonals intersect at the midpoint of both diagonals, then the figure formed will be some parallelogram. In order for two diagonals to form a non-isosceles trapezoid, the following relationships must hold true: If AB is one diagonal and DE is the other diagonal, then trapezoid ADBE is formed only if the diagonals intersect at point P, which is not the midpoint, and AP/PB = DP/PE. This relationship was quite difficult for the students to investigate and conclude. The students did not choose to measure the diagonals with rulers, and therefore did not pick up on the proportional aspects of the diagonals in a non-isosceles trapezoid.” This clip is also indicative of standard 1 (make sense of problems & persevere in solving them), standard 3 (construct viable arguments & critique the reasoning of others), and standard 6 (attend to precision).

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure.

In the closing of the group work on the first day, Humphreys refers her students to the idea of “mathematical friends.” This notion came from Thinking Mathematically by Burton and Mason, a book about mathematical problem solving in which the authors talk about a hierarchy of certainty when trying to write a convincing argument. Convince yourself (the easiest), convince a [mathematical] friend, and finally, convince a skeptic. Developing a skeptical mindset and not jumping to conclusions too quickly is another hallmark of good mathematical thinking. Humphreys asks to meet with the students who are playing the role of “facilitators” in their groups to ensure that the Burton and Mason argumentation structure is followed. This clip is also indicative of standard 3 (construct viable arguments & critique the reasoning of others), standard 6 (attend to precision), and standard 8 (look for & express regularity in repeated reasoning).

Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure...They recognize the significance of an existing line in a geometric figure and can use the strategy of drawing an auxiliary line for solving problems. They also can step back for an overview and shift perspective.

Carlos Cabana works with his high school English language learning students on algebraic reasoning and multiple representations around parabolas. In this clip, his students work together in a group, clarifying each other's process and thinking. The female students clarify accurate steps for the male student. They discuss how to use the x- and y-intercepts to support their process. They step back and ask themselves what they are seeking in their work.